|
AZ it was
Geoffrey Barnard
This article first appeared in
NMA 7
magazine. In it, the author discusses aspects of the early formation of AZ
Music, formed around composer David Ahern in Sydney during the 1970s.
In any discussion of AZ Music - what its significance
was in the broader context of contemporary music,
internationally, during its existence, how (and why) it came into
being, perhaps the ramifications (if any) that are felt today
- it is essential to bear in mind
from the outset that AZ actually comprised two distinct phases in
its (almost) six year history: the first running from its
inception in February 1970 to August 1972, and the second roughly
from the beginning of 1973 to the end of 1975. This article deals
exclusively with that first (formative) phase of AZ Music.
Sounds come and go.
AZ music grew out of the free weekly
class in experimental music - the Laboratory of the Creative Ear
- which David Ahern started at the Sydney Conservatorium of Music
in February 1970, in much the same way as The Scratch Orchestra
developed out of Cornelius Cardew's class at Morley College the
previous year. Not insignificantly, Ahern had just returned from
overseas, London in particular, having been involved with the
Scratch Orchestra from the time it was founded.
Listening
with a bent ear, I retain the memory of some, not all
.
The
influence of Cardew on our activities in the class was paramount,
with emphasis on non-elitist, non-hierarchical forms of
music-making, essentially for people without the `benefit' of a
formal `musical' education. The concerns of La Monte Young
relating to audition and the psycho-acoustic by-products of the
auditory process were also very prevalent.
Standing at one
point in the universe, notate what you hear with what you see
.
Writing on the history of The Scratch Orchestra, Rod Eley is
quick to point out that the nucleus of the Morley College
composers "were dissatisfied with the elitism of `serious'
music and its strong class image, and with the repression of
working musicians into the role of slavish hacks churning out the
stock repertoire of concert hall and opera house"
[1]
. Certainly
a number of us attending Ahern's class on a regular basis felt
that, by means of our activities, we were subverting bourgeois
cultural values. Essentially we reacted against the tyranny of
the self-contained music-object, not only that which had emerged
out of the tradition of tonal functional harmony, but also that
which embodied the authoritarianism of serialism and subsequent
developments in European contemporary composition.
A catalogue is an ordered representation of what you hear and
what you see
.
Right from the start in these classes, the
essence of music-making was explored. Notions about the identity
of a piece of music, the ontological status of scores, the
function of notation and the relationship of composition to
improvisation were thrown up and re-assessed through our efforts
in both composition and performance.
Composing's one thing,
performing's another, listening's a third. What can they have to
do with one another?
`Compositions' were primarily verbal,
though some graphic scores were produced, but the emphasis in the
main was on
improvisation rites
,
glees
and
catalogues
, with some very interesting work being done by
Peter Evans, Roger Frampton and artist Peter Kennedy.
Glees
are patterns and preparations for song. They are plans for action
- vocal chord action
.
AZ Music `officially' came into being with the presentation of a
24-hour concert at Watters Gallery in East Sydney over the
weekend of 21-22 February 1970. This temporal `block' was defined
by a performance of Erik Satie's
Vexations
against which works
by American composers (La Monte Young's
Trio for Strings
1958,
Composition 1960 #7
and
Composition 1960 #9
- and Christian
Wolff's
Stones
, from his
Prose Collection
of 1968-69) were
realised. Duration, then, became a `concrete' dimension in
itself, affirming the thrust of Young's music towards
(perpetuating) a sense of `timelessness'.
I think that music
is now able to be not so much `listened to' but `existed in'
.
Pianist Peter Evans stopped playing after the 595th repetition
and was replaced by Linda Wilson, who completed the performance.
I felt each repetition slowly wearing my mind away. I had to
stop. If I hadn't stopped I'd be a very different person
today...People who play it do so at their own peril
.
Over the next two and a half years, AZ went on to propagate much
of the music that has since been documented by Michael Nyman in
his book
Experimental Music
: indeterminate compositions by
John Cage (in particular his
Imaginary Landscape No 4
(1952) for
12 radios and 24 players and his
Concert for Piano and Orchestra
(1957-58), Christian Wolff and Morty Feldman; live electronic
music; the `new tonality' of Terry Riley (
In C
) and Steve Reich
(
Piano Phase
); Cardew's
The Great Learning
(1968-70), Paragraphs
1, 2, 4, 6 and 7, as well as a fragment of his graphic score
Treatise
(1963-67); free electronic-acoustic improvisation
(following the formation of the group Teletopa); works by local
composers, particularly David Ahern, Roger Frampton and Ernie
Gallagher.
During this period, the `noisicians' of AZ were to acquire a
reputation as the `enfants terribles' of the Sydney music scene
and were constantly ridiculed in the press by critics who accused
us of deliberately inflicting various forms of aural air
pollution on a gullible and unsuspecting public. Our notoriety
increased considerably during 1971 by virtue of two separate
incidents which bear recounting in some detail.
At the Sydney Proms in February, an augmented AZ ensemble took
part in a realisation of Paragraph 2 of Cardew's
The Great
Learning
, simultaneously with the first public improvisation of
the group
Teletopa
. While the four members of Teletopa
were up on the stage of the Sydney Town Hall, the five groups
required by the Cardew composition (each comprising a drummer and
a number of singers) were placed at various points in the body of
the hall. As critic Roger Covell remarked in his review of the
night's events, it was the first time in the local history of
the series that the audience did actually promenade. However, the
dissent of many in the audience was not confined to merely
`promenading right out the door'. A good number were overtly
aggressive, jostling performers, snatching drumsticks out of
their hands or tipping water on them from the upstairs balconies.
The Town Hall guards joined in the occasion, and one such
charismatic individual (who bore an uncanny resemblance to Dan
Blocker's
Hoss
from the TV series
Bonanza
, both in
his physique and good looks) threatened to break me in two if I
didn't pack up my gear and clear out. As he succinctly put it:
"The show's over"!
In October that year, a realisation of Cage's
Piano Duet
by Roger
Frampton and Geoffrey Collins took place in the Conservatorium's
Verbrugghen Hall. The score used was that of
Cartridge Music
(1960), whereby contact microphones are to be attached to the
body of a grand piano - which necessitated putting music stands,
kitchen utensils, pillows and sheets of plastic inside the piano.
This was too much for the assistant director of the
Conservatorium, Francis Cameron, to bear. Horrified at the
"vandalism" being inflicted on the Conservatorium's
precious Steinway, he jumped up on stage during the performance,
locked the lid of the piano and pocketed the key, a red carnation
quivering indignantly in his lapel.
The music that typified this initial phase of AZ was clearly the
antithesis of the music of such contemporary composers as Boulez,
Berio, Stockhausen, Xenakis, Birtwistle or Maxwell Davies,
"conceived and executed along the well-trodden but sanctified
path of the post-Renaissance tradition" (Nyman), where the
relationships between components within each composition are of
prime concern. Running very much against the propensity for
creating aesthetic objects were Cage's ideas regarding process
and the bringing into play of sounds free (for the most part) of
fixed relations between each other, and the endeavour (in theory,
at least) to blur the distinctions between composers, performers
and listeners.
A music requiring particular attention to
listening among performers, to coordinating, to developing a
sense of timing - when to lead, when to remain silent, when to
join, each of these available to any performer
.
Perhaps the
pertinent aspect of so many indeterminate and improvised works is
that they offer themselves implicitly, by means of their very
structure, as "models of classlessness in opposition to
[economic] class domination"
[2]
, affirming a stance that is
essentially anarchistic.
AZ Music, then, was both a flexible body of performers of varying
ability and an entrepreneurial organisation. The `inner sanctum'
of AZ was always a quite separate entity from the body of people
who attended Ahern's class, though naturally there was bound to
be a considerable overlap in terms of the specific individuals
involved. Having been `obliged' to move from its original
premises at the Conservatorium after only a matter of weeks, the
class eventually became `formalised' under the auspices of WEA
and continued to provide a pool of performers required by such
large-scale works as
The Great Learning
through 1971 and into
1972. It was out of the remnants of the second WEA `terms' that
the Sunday Ensemble emerged.
[3]
Those of us who made up the
entrepreneurial coterie were responsible not only for organising
all the AZ concerts - and besides determining the `content' in
each case, this involved the spade work necessary for securing
suitable venues - but also were actively engaged in designing
posters, brochures and the like, compiling program notes and
seeing to the distribution of such advertising material in
accordance with AZ Music's extensive mailing list.
Despite Ahern's standing as a composer prior to the formation of
AZ - by virtue of such works as
After Mallarmé
,
Music for Nine
,
Ned Kelly Music
,
Network
and
Journal
- he was to compose only
one major work during these early years of AZ Music,
Stereo/Mono
.
This is a live electronic work written in 1971 for wind soloist,
who is required to not only elicit high, medium or low feedback
tones through one or both loudspeakers for specific durations
(long, medium or short), but also to interact with these feedback
tones or to substitute an acoustic instrumental tone for that of
a feedback tone. Written in a graphic (or symbolic) notation,
Stereo/Mono
bears the influence of such compositions as
Stockhausen's
Spiral
and
Prozession
, while ultimately forging a
link with the work of American composers David Behrman (
Wave
Train
) and Gordon Mumma (
Hornpipe
). The work received its
premiere realisation in December 1971 by soloist Roger Frampton
playing saxophone and saxorecorder (a plastic recorder fitted
with a saxophone mouthpiece), with Ahern controlling the
potentiometer.
Pieces such as
Stereo/Mono
reflected AZ's move away from
composition per se towards a playing situation weighted in favour
of improvisation. One tendency did emerge within the group that
was, in effect, at variance with this general direction. The
highly idiosyncratic projects propounded by Ernie Gallagher
challenged the traditional composer/performer/listener
configuration and accordingly placed the listener at the centre
of the creative process. His off-centre record project (1971)
required a hole punched slightly off-centre in any 33
1
/
3
, 45 or
78 rpm recordings and for the re-designed discs to then be played
on suitable audio equipment. Even though two off-centre
realisations -
Sonata in F by Mozart
and
Robert Allworth
- were
given hearings in traditional concert situations (in 1971 and
1972 respectively), his off-centre record project and subsequent
compositions concern themselves with personal auditory
explorations without necessary reference to usual
performer/audience contexts. The performer, in fact, becomes
redundant. These
personal
listening experiences extend
into a completely
private
realm in
Stethophonics
(1971-72), where a standard binaural stethoscope is (primarily
but not exclusively) used in conjunction with an acoustic
resonator to alter the sound(s) of the aural environment as
perceived by the listener, the transformation of the awareness of
the listener being constituted as a form of `content' in itself.
What is improvisation?
The improvisation group Teletopa
was founded in the spring of 1970. The nucleus of the group
consisted of Ahern, Evans and Frampton, though at various stages
over the following two years membership included Linda Wilson,
Philip L Ryan, myself and Geoffrey Collins.
Does it have
anything to do with improving?
The name `Teletopa' was
derived from the Greek
topas
, "as used by Plato,
meaning `the place of the origin of ideas;
tele
, a prefix
meaning `far, distant, an openness to any ideas whatsoever'"
(Phillip L Ryan). And as Ahern would insist, implicit in the
prefix
tele
was the ensemble's global outlook, a
willingness and a readiness to use sound materials found in every
corner of the world.
Take away notation and what have you
got?
Teletopa, in essence, was a `pure' electro-acoustic
improvisation group, utilising contact microphones to amplify all
sound sources, from traditional instruments such as violin,
saxophone and flute, to various percussive devices, sheets of
tin, glass and masonite, metal and plastic materials, vacuum
cleaner and shortwave radio.
Bibbidy, Bobbidy, Boo?
The in-performance characteristic of Teletopa - of seeking or
questing after new sounds - was fraught with danger, yet this
precariousness was inevitable, an intrinsic part of the very
fabric of free improvisation.
We are searching for sounds and
for the responses that attach to them, rather than thinking them
up, preparing them and producing them. The search is conducted in
the medium of sound and the musician himself is at the heart of
the experiment
.
As Ernie Gallagher remarked at the time,
sounds "are discarded as soon as they are created because of
the danger of becoming known, or becoming knowable. This
uncertainty is essential to a live, as distinct from preserved,
performance."
[4]
Teletopa perpetuated a viable, open form of music-making which
hinged on the integrity and self-discipline of the players for
its success or otherwise. The improvisations, like so much of
Christian Wolff's music, retained the notion of musical
performance as a "dynamic, social activity"
[5]
,
self-realisation coming about through a social process
.
Yet Teletopa was probably more like the English group AMM (with
which Cardew was associated during the late 1960s), both
musically and in terms of its social structure, than other groups
in existence at the time such as Musica Elettronica Viva
(US/Italy) or the Taj Mahal Travellers (Japan): "extremely
self-contained and private, basically hostile to
`out-siders' " (Nyman). While Teletopa, in its two years, only
performed publicly on a small number of occasions, the group
would play on a regular weekly basis behind closed doors at the
Inhibodress Gallery in Woolloomooloo.
Connected with this is
the proposition that improvisation cannot be rehearsed. Training
is substituted for rehearsal, and a certain moral discipline is
an essential part of this training
.
It was here that the
regular members of Teletopa were often joined by Greg Matheson,
who (rumour has it) would ride his push-bike across the Nullabor
to Sydney from Perth, seeking respite from post-graduate studies
in Psychology.
In August 1972, several members of Teletopa (Ahern, Frampton and
Collins) embarked on a two month overseas tour in conjunction
with the International Carnival of Experimental Sound (ICES) in
England, linking up there with Peter Evans. Sadly, a marked
contradiction became apparent between the implicit anarchistic
orientation of Teletopa, with its sense of communality and
reliance on mutual aid within the group, and the actual playing
situation which had emerged. And despite Ahern's professed
Utopian vision of a world "in which communication is free and
spontaneous between human beings", Gavin Bryars made the
observation, reviewing one of Teletopa's improvisations at
London's Round House, that certain members of the group
"would play in an heroically dramatic way which gave a
sustained
hierarchical
view of their music-making (unlike
early AMM music in which this was also present, the relationship
did not significantly change in that David Ahern maintained a
dominant
role...)"
[6]
. As a consequence, irreconcilable
differences arose between specific individuals in the group,
leading ultimately to the disbanding of Teletopa.
From the beginning of 1973, AZ Music took a completely different
path, in effect the antithesis of the original directions AZ had
taken. The idealism which endeavoured to bring about a set of
contexts whereby "concepts such as the specialised performer
and concert-giving itself start to fall apart" (Ahern), gave
way to a new phase that re-affirmed the conventional concert
situation. This second phase of AZ Music was characterised by an
emphasis on through-composition, particularly the work of young
Australian composers Cameron Allan, Robert Irving, Allan Holley
and Carl Vine, the dissemination of these Pieces in such
`respectable' venues as the Recording Hall of the Sydney Opera
House and the hiring of professional musicians.
Looking back, however, the significance of Ahern during these
years (1970-75) should not be underestimated. In fact, what
Feldman said of Cardew in 1967 could justifiably have been
claimed in relation to Ahern several years later: "If the new
ideas in music are felt today as a movement in [Australia], it's
because he acts as a moral force, a moral centre."
[7]
Yet it
was the activities of AZ Music specifically during those early
years that were "too thorny for the Australian musical
establishment to handle"
[8]
, an establishment presided over by
people such as Donald Peart and saturated with the residue of
late-Romantic English composition. Paradoxically, the ideas of
Cardew, giving vent to peculiarly
English
sensibility -
arising, as they did, out of a tradition of amateur music-making
- were transposed into a local context and served to underpin the
radical diversions of AZ Music.
Footnotes
1. Eley, R. "A History of The Scratch
Orchestra", in Cornelius Cardew,
Stockhausen Serves Imperialism
Latimer New Dimensions London 1974 p.12
back
2. Metzger, HK. "Essay on Prerevolutionary
Music", in the booklet accompanying the 4-record set
Music
Before Revolution
(HMV 1 C 165-28 954/57Y)
back
3. The Sunday Ensemble was one of two subgroups to
emerge out of AZ Music (the other one being Teletopa), whose
membership consisted of the following individuals: Deirdre Evans,
Ernie Gallagher, Greg Schiemer, Kathie Drake, Robert Irving,
Ruth, Ann and Richard Lucas, John and Nan Sundbury and Malcolm
Smith.
back
4. Gallagher, E. "The State of the Art" in
Music Maker
vol.38 no.29 (October 1971) p.28
back
5. See Christopher Fox, "Music as Social
Process: some aspects of the work of Christian Wolff" in
Contact
30 (Spring 1987)
back
6. Bryars, G. "ICES" (review) in
Music and
Musicians
December 1972 p.72, emphasis added
back
7. Feldman, F. "Conversations without
Stravinsky" in
London Magazine
March 1967 p.88
back
8. See Richard Toop, "The Concert Hall Avant
Garde: Where Is It? "
Art Network
6, Winter 1982
back
© 2001 NMA Publications and Geoffrey Barnard.
back
to magazine index.
|